Saturday, February 05, 2005

Op ed on Infoshop

In my rash of recent posts, I never got around to putting a link up to my own op ed that I penned concerning Ward Churchill, freedom of speech, and attacks from the right-wing limiting that freedom.

Chuck and the good folks over at Infoshop picked up the op ed that I wrote and shopped to several left-leaning websites. With the subject of free speech front and center in the controversy swirling around Churchill, I would have thought a few more websites and bloggers would have had something to say about it. With Bill O'Reilly's nightly character assasinations against Churchill, I kept waiting for someone with a national forum, like Al Franken and Air America to take up his defense. Apparently, free speech that crosses whatever line Churchill was deemed to have crossed by the liberal arbiters of good taste, warrants shunning.

Bloggers like Atrios, Daily Kos, and even David Brock over at Media Matters had nothing to say about calls for censor and demands for Churchill's job at the University of Colorado. Even David Neiwert, who's written extensively on the rise of fascist tendencies in the U.S. was silent about this. Common Dreams, a newswire that carries a wide spectrum of progressive thought and opinion chose to run an op ed criticising Churchill. The obvious clamping down on dissent certainly warranted more commentary from the left. Lord knows it's been all over Free Republic and other right-leaning sites.

I have my own thoughts as to why this is, but I'll save it for a later post. I've spent a good part of the past three days writing, sending emails and making phone calls in support of Churchill. I need some time away from my keyboard. With the temperature in the 50's outside, the spring thaw up here in the Northeast is upon us. I think I'll get out and enjoy the sunshine and maybe put on the x-country skis and take a buzz through the pines.

4 comments:

  1. Anonymous3:11 PM

    I think the lack of support coming from the left (better use would have been liberals, rather than left) has to do with Churchill not fitting their profile of polite protest.

    Churchill, regardless of one's opinion of him, certainly has a right to say what he did and not be facing the level of attack that he is.

    Ugliness begets ugliness; the U.S. foreign policy has been every bit of that and worse. Engaging in state-sponsored terror under the flag of freedom and liberation is fraudulent.

    Too many liberals want to straddle the fence on wearing their progressive ideals on their lapel (or bumper), while doing little in the way to bring about real change.

    Marty
    anmin1517@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Marty,

    I'd tend to agree with you. You can see it over at CommonDreams--alot of sniping rather than rallying around a comrade that needs support.

    The conservatives are winning the battles because they can find a way to unite around Das Fuhrer, despite his reprehensible policies. Liberals and even progressives are given to hair-splitting and purity tests, instead of solidarity.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Richard,

    Excellent points about liberals and also the historical significance of all of this. Our historical amnesia is killing us!

    Glad you've been posting--I've tried to do as much as I can in that manner.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous9:50 PM

    I'm not suprised that the so-called
    liberals such as Al Franken, Norman
    Solomon, Marc Cooper and the phony
    Nation didn't come to the defense
    of Brother Churchill. The Democrats
    silence on this shows how truly
    pathetic they are as a party. It's
    quite amazing that some right wing
    trash such as former majority leader, Richard Armey can get away
    with stating that "Palestinians
    should just leave Israel" which
    is a racist statement, yet Brother
    Churchill can tell the raw truth of
    why America is hated throughout the world and gets a media lynching.
    Brother Churchill didn't go before
    the United Nations and lie about
    Iraq's so-called "Weapons of Mass
    Destruction." Brother Chuchill was
    not responsible for the 9-11 attacks and furthermore, Brother
    Churchill didn't tell the press
    that Joseph Wilson's wife, Valerie
    Plame was working for the CIA.
    Brother Churchill is 100% right. His comments is supported by the
    Army's War College and the Pew
    research that said that America's
    foriegn policy and indiffrence
    to the sufferings of other populations is causing record level
    hate for this country even by it's
    long standing allies.
    Supporting Brother Churchill is
    a support for freedom, justice
    and accountability. Something that
    the so-called liberals and phony
    so-called conservatives have no
    concept of.

    ReplyDelete